Engine, with low mileage if possible

[Darkblitz9]

I have a 95 3.1L and the engine is crapping out on me, if I cant figure out the issue then Im going to need a new one, I'm looking for another 3.1, OR a Quad 4 if it would match the engine mounts, if not then just the 3.1, Thanks

[beroutofjtown]

i know were you can get a complete 3.1 motor for a hundred bucks........ only thing is is that it all needs to be put back together. he took it apart n was going to put a different block together but he got a 3800 supercharged to put into a cavy lol. let me know. were do u live

[DTMAce]

Quad won't match up to the mounts, and it won't work with your current harness or ECU. So you are better off to drop in another 3100 or go 3400.

[Asylum]

www.car-parts.com

[1989bgtu]

I have a 91 3.1, ran great 200 takes it

[DTMAce]

Nice offer 1989 but the older MPFI won't work in an SFI (94 and newer) model again without modification to mounts and harness change and such.

[3X00-Modified]

It will not run properly... your missing the high resolution crank sensor and the SFI cam sensor. ECM will not be happy.

[1989bgtu]

I put one in a 97 Malibu, like you said a few easy mods, sensors being swapped
out, and the intake from what I remember. But it didn't trip and codes, and ran fine

[3X00-Modified]

You put a MPFI motor into a 97 OBDII Malibu and didn't trip any codes? I find that REALLY hard to believe since the MPFI's use a three solenoid EGR valve and if you do not hook that up which OBDII does not support, then you will get a EGR code while driving.

Also talk about one hell of a downgrade... thats going from a 160hp motor to a 140hp one.

[woody90gtz]

I'm gonna swap a stock 305 in my Camaro.

[Cliff8928]

I'm gonna swap a stock 305 in my Camaro.

You can't find a 262?

[3X00-Modified]

its 265... whopping 165 HP

265

The 265 cu in (4.3 L) V8 was the first Chevrolet small block. Designed by Ed Cole's group at Chevrolet to provide a more powerful engine for the 1955 Corvette than the model's original "stove bolt" in-line six, the 165 hp (123 kW)[2] 2-barrel debut version went from drawings to production in just 15 weeks.

A pushrod cast-iron engine with hydraulic lifters, the small block was available with an optional 4-barrel Rochester carburetor, increasing engine output to 195 hp (145 kW). The oversquare (3.75 in (95 mm) bore, 3 in (76 mm) stroke) engine's 4.4 in (111.8 mm) bore spacing would continue in use for decades.

Also available in the Bel Air sedan, the basic passenger car version produced 162 hp (121 kW) with a 2-barrel carburetor. Upgraded to a four-barrel Rochester, dual exhaust "Power Pack" version, the engine was conservatively rated at 180 hp (134 kW).

A shortcoming of the 1955 265 was that the engine had no provision for oil filtration built into the block, instead relying on an add-on filter mounted on the thermostat housing. In spite of its novel green-sand foundry construction, the '55 block's lack of adequate oil filtration leaves it typically only desirable to period collectors.

The 1956 Corvette introduced three versions of this engine - 210 hp (157 kW) with a single 4-barrel carb, 225 hp (168 kW) with twin 4-barrels, and 240 hp (179 kW) with twin fours and a high-lift cam.

[Cliff8928]

There was a 262 in the 70s... 110HP.

There was also another 263 from 94-96 that was 200 HP.

[woody90gtz]

And the 350 stock in an 80 Z28 was 190hp. hahaha

[MY91GT(Z)]

i had a 260 2 bbl in my first car 79 cutlass salon brougham it would be lucky to have 110 hp but sucked sh1+ load of gas too