1996 Mr.Pink
- 3X00-Modified
- Administrator
- Posts: 10915
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:18 am
- Location: Brooklyn CT
Re: 1996 Mr.Pink
I'm really going to love this tool, But I hate the fact that it's so damn expensive. I got this because it's the best one I've found that will do 37* flares, so I'm ordering the supreme kit that does all other flares and adding on the 37* die's so I can do those as well. It's going to be nice to be able to replicate the GM flare used on the body side fuel lines. I'm dropping $367.73 for the whole setup with extra die's
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mastercool-7147 ... 32&vxp=mtr
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mastercool-7147 ... 32&vxp=mtr
- Money pit Beretta
- Registered User
- Posts: 6411
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:36 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: 1996 Mr.Pink
I guess it's better than the old way, but ouch.
Could be wrong, but I thought Eastwood had something for less.
Could be wrong, but I thought Eastwood had something for less.
keep'em flying!
- 3X00-Modified
- Administrator
- Posts: 10915
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:18 am
- Location: Brooklyn CT
Re: 1996 Mr.Pink
HA, not quite, they want $539 for the tool I just bought, and 400 for one that does 37* 45* single and 45* double and tube swaging...
http://www.eastwood.com/flare-pro-4-in- ... -tool.html
http://www.eastwood.com/universal-hydra ... g-kit.html
Eastwood also says its "not for stainless tubing" but right on MasterCool's website it says its fine for light stainless which I would guess if I can bend the tube by hand this will put a 37* single flare on it... LOL
With the added flares this one does it just makes it so much more worth it. Speedway Motors has the older bench style one, but its $54 to do one flare style, Rigid also has one for $98... I still needed something to do a good quick disconnect flare, so as a 6-1 multi flaring tool this is the best way to go.
All of these

Plus the single 45* flare, and a 37* flare
I've also gotten to the point in my life where if there is a nice easy professional tool to use and it's a bit more expensive than say a mechanical version that spits out "ok" results, then I'm going spend the money on the pro version so it just works. I think I own about four mechanical 45* double flare tools, all of which are a bit tired, do the math at $29 each... this should outlive those in a heartbeat.
http://www.eastwood.com/flare-pro-4-in- ... -tool.html
http://www.eastwood.com/universal-hydra ... g-kit.html
Eastwood also says its "not for stainless tubing" but right on MasterCool's website it says its fine for light stainless which I would guess if I can bend the tube by hand this will put a 37* single flare on it... LOL
With the added flares this one does it just makes it so much more worth it. Speedway Motors has the older bench style one, but its $54 to do one flare style, Rigid also has one for $98... I still needed something to do a good quick disconnect flare, so as a 6-1 multi flaring tool this is the best way to go.
All of these
Plus the single 45* flare, and a 37* flare
I've also gotten to the point in my life where if there is a nice easy professional tool to use and it's a bit more expensive than say a mechanical version that spits out "ok" results, then I'm going spend the money on the pro version so it just works. I think I own about four mechanical 45* double flare tools, all of which are a bit tired, do the math at $29 each... this should outlive those in a heartbeat.
Re: 1996 Mr.Pink
I have one of these tools at work. Your going to love it. Nice easy operation. The only downside is its size, tough to get into spots sometimes. Usually you can still use it. When doing a lot of flares its awesome you will thank yourself for getting it
- Asylum
- Registered User
- Posts: 3050
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 9:36 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: 1996 Mr.Pink
Always buy the best tools you can afford.
Eric
Asylum Motorsports
"Where we're not happy 'til YOU'RE not happy!
'91 California Quad (Gone with just a bit of "Seller's Remorse".)
'92 3500 GT gone and not really missed. It was fun. Documented 13.47 N/A.
Asylum Motorsports
"Where we're not happy 'til YOU'RE not happy!
'91 California Quad (Gone with just a bit of "Seller's Remorse".)
'92 3500 GT gone and not really missed. It was fun. Documented 13.47 N/A.
- Asylum
- Registered User
- Posts: 3050
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 9:36 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: 1996 Mr.Pink
And I get the 500th post, LOL
Eric
Asylum Motorsports
"Where we're not happy 'til YOU'RE not happy!
'91 California Quad (Gone with just a bit of "Seller's Remorse".)
'92 3500 GT gone and not really missed. It was fun. Documented 13.47 N/A.
Asylum Motorsports
"Where we're not happy 'til YOU'RE not happy!
'91 California Quad (Gone with just a bit of "Seller's Remorse".)
'92 3500 GT gone and not really missed. It was fun. Documented 13.47 N/A.
- 3X00-Modified
- Administrator
- Posts: 10915
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:18 am
- Location: Brooklyn CT
Re: 1996 Mr.Pink
I have a harder time getting one of those bench setups into spots... but I really don't see me needing to get into really tight spots... most of the bending flaring and fabricating I do off the car. Or at least for this stuff I will be.Barry wrote:I have one of these tools at work. Your going to love it. Nice easy operation. The only downside is its size, tough to get into spots sometimes. Usually you can still use it. When doing a lot of flares its awesome you will thank yourself for getting it
- Money pit Beretta
- Registered User
- Posts: 6411
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:36 am
- Location: Kansas
Re: 1996 Mr.Pink
Whoa... must have missed the price of the Eastwood stuff. Cool, now you can make fitted lines for all of us!


keep'em flying!
- woody90gtz
- Registered User
- Posts: 4740
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 8:45 pm
- Location: Walton, NY
- Contact:
Re: 1996 Mr.Pink
Sweeeeeet. My AN flaring tool doesn't look as pretty. Mine was like $30 from Summit. haha
91 "SS" - WOT 3400/5spd - 13.29@101.6 - World's fastest N/A FWD Beretta
96 "T56" LS/6spd/8.8 RWD swap - 13.45@104.7 lol
GEARHEAD dezign youtube
96 "T56" LS/6spd/8.8 RWD swap - 13.45@104.7 lol
GEARHEAD dezign youtube
- 3X00-Modified
- Administrator
- Posts: 10915
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:18 am
- Location: Brooklyn CT
Re: 1996 Mr.Pink
Got some more done,



I think this area will work for the coils too, just gotta weld up a bracket.






I think this area will work for the coils too, just gotta weld up a bracket.



Re: 1996 Mr.Pink
I'm going to ask the dumb question.
Why not have these routed to just on either side of the 3400 logo, right above the intake? (I know that isn't the intake you have, but thinking location)
Shorter run, and with a couple of simple brackets made up mounted to an intake bolt or two, you would be done. Though it may not be as "pretty" I suppose. Just saying. But then I'm a complete noob at NOS so what do I know. Just looks from the pics that it would have been simpler yet still work the same.
Why not have these routed to just on either side of the 3400 logo, right above the intake? (I know that isn't the intake you have, but thinking location)
Shorter run, and with a couple of simple brackets made up mounted to an intake bolt or two, you would be done. Though it may not be as "pretty" I suppose. Just saying. But then I'm a complete noob at NOS so what do I know. Just looks from the pics that it would have been simpler yet still work the same.
94' Z26 Project - 95' Base Project - Custom LED Light Conversions!
Chosen Proposal Submission & Committee Member for Beretta Fest 2012 in Traverse City Michigan


Chosen Proposal Submission & Committee Member for Beretta Fest 2012 in Traverse City Michigan


- 3X00-Modified
- Administrator
- Posts: 10915
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:18 am
- Location: Brooklyn CT
Re: 1996 Mr.Pink
With the spacers the engine barely fit under the hood, it's actually one of the two reasons why I went back to the 3100 plenum the corner of the 3500 one would hit the hood I believe, I was going to put the blocks on top of the intake but there just isn't enough clearance. Plus this ends up working better with the ICM and Coils. That is the intake I will be using now though.
Re: 1996 Mr.Pink
Too bad there isn't enough space under the intake. With the spacers, there might be though, but you have already tapped the spacers for your lines. lol
94' Z26 Project - 95' Base Project - Custom LED Light Conversions!
Chosen Proposal Submission & Committee Member for Beretta Fest 2012 in Traverse City Michigan


Chosen Proposal Submission & Committee Member for Beretta Fest 2012 in Traverse City Michigan


- 3X00-Modified
- Administrator
- Posts: 10915
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:18 am
- Location: Brooklyn CT
Re: 1996 Mr.Pink
I could change that but with those nozzles it's impossible. They need to be at that orientation to spray down, I would have to get a different style nozzle that has the inlets horizontal and not stacked to hide it under the plenum.
Re: 1996 Mr.Pink
what did you find you spacer thickness to be Jon?3X00-Modified wrote:With the spacers the engine barely fit under the hood, it's actually one of the two reasons why I went back to the 3100 plenum the corner of the 3500 one would hit the hood I believe, I was going to put the blocks on top of the intake but there just isn't enough clearance. Plus this ends up working better with the ICM and Coils. That is the intake I will be using now though.
Theres someone on here i cannot remember who but they are running two sets of 3/8 phenolic spacers i believe
1 Of 1 Street Legal Centri S/c Beretta's In Existance