2.8 Performance ideas

Want to know how to get more out of your Beretta? Or have a mod you would like to share?
User avatar
Kris GTwhat?
Registered User
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:14 am
Location: Moline (Quad Cities), Illinois

Re: 2.8 Performance ideas

Post by Kris GTwhat? »

i dont think so.. id just have the guy make you one.. if its not done correctly and makes your motor sit wierd, even an inch off, and all you'll do is chew through axles. he said he'd make me one for 90 bucks. saves you time and the hassle. but thats just how i feel. im sure he would hook you up with the blueprint though
Image

1991 GTZ: RIP
ronaconda
Registered User
Posts: 688
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, UT

Re: 2.8 Performance ideas

Post by ronaconda »

You are going to have more than just mount issues if you plan on sticking with the auto. The dipstick tube will need to be modified if you plan on using the 3x00 manifolds as the newer style rear manifold will not allow the dipstick to use its current mount location. Also, the rear manifold will be VERY close to the auto shifter cable. A shifter setup (shifter, cable, mount) from a 92/93 with the 3t40 remedies this problem. These won't be problems if you stick with the 2.8/3.1 manifolds, which i WOULD NOT do.
User avatar
jking18
Registered User
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:18 pm
Location: South Haven, MI

Re: 2.8 Performance ideas

Post by jking18 »

Kris GTwhat? wrote:i dont think so.. id just have the guy make you one.. if its not done correctly and makes your motor sit wierd, even an inch off, and all you'll do is chew through axles. he said he'd make me one for 90 bucks. saves you time and the hassle. but thats just how i feel. im sure he would hook you up with the blueprint though
Are you talking about daveydude on V6Z24.com?
Image
1989 Beretta Base 2.8
User avatar
jking18
Registered User
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:18 pm
Location: South Haven, MI

Re: 2.8 Performance ideas

Post by jking18 »

ronaconda wrote:You are going to have more than just mount issues if you plan on sticking with the auto. The dipstick tube will need to be modified if you plan on using the 3x00 manifolds as the newer style rear manifold will not allow the dipstick to use its current mount location. Also, the rear manifold will be VERY close to the auto shifter cable. A shifter setup (shifter, cable, mount) from a 92/93 with the 3t40 remedies this problem. These won't be problems if you stick with the 2.8/3.1 manifolds, which i WOULD NOT do.
Thanks for the heads up. Anything else that I should know?
edit: I wanted to use the 4t60e trans. Would the shifter setup work on it?
Image
1989 Beretta Base 2.8
User avatar
Kris GTwhat?
Registered User
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:14 am
Location: Moline (Quad Cities), Illinois

Re: 2.8 Performance ideas

Post by Kris GTwhat? »

Yep that's who I am talking about
Image

1991 GTZ: RIP
ronaconda
Registered User
Posts: 688
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, UT

Re: 2.8 Performance ideas

Post by ronaconda »

jking18 wrote:
ronaconda wrote:You are going to have more than just mount issues if you plan on sticking with the auto. The dipstick tube will need to be modified if you plan on using the 3x00 manifolds as the newer style rear manifold will not allow the dipstick to use its current mount location. Also, the rear manifold will be VERY close to the auto shifter cable. A shifter setup (shifter, cable, mount) from a 92/93 with the 3t40 remedies this problem. These won't be problems if you stick with the 2.8/3.1 manifolds, which i WOULD NOT do.
Thanks for the heads up. Anything else that I should know?
edit: I wanted to use the 4t60e trans. Would the shifter setup work on it?
The 4t60e will not work as the "e" designation means it is computer controlled. There are mid 80's to early 90's vehicles that used a non-"e" 4t60 that will work. I would still grab the shifter components i mentioned simply because it is located away from the exhaust. As far as the dipstick issue - it mounts different on the 4t60 so may just need some minor tweaking to route it correctly.
1988GTU
Registered User
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2002 1:06 pm
Location: A town up north

Re: 2.8 Performance ideas

Post by 1988GTU »

350.00 iirc will get you the needed electronics to run a 60e or 65e (your choice) if you wish to go that route.
_________
Image
-------------
Post Reply